Tech UK
Can artists protect their work from AI? – BBC News
issues with the technology is copyright.
The output of AI systems is built upon the output of creators, AIs are trained on millions of human-made images.
BBC Click’s Ben Derico investigates how artists can protect their work from the growing power of generative AI.
Please subscribe here: http://bit.ly/1rbfUog
#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #BBCNews
source
A new personalised vaccine given in combination with a drug has stopped skin cancer returning in patients during a trial, representing a potentially watershed moment in cancer treatment. Scientists used mRNA technology, which was used for some Covid-19 vaccines.
But that technology – and vaccines more generally – have become increasingly controversial in the United States since the Covid-19 pandemic. The Health Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr, is a vaccine sceptic.
In August 2025 cancelled $500m (£376m) in funding for mRNA vaccine research. The move impacted 22 projects being led by major pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer and Moderna, for vaccines against bird flu and other viruses, according to Kennedy’s department.
We speak to Tom Whipple, host of the BBC’s Inside Science programme, about the science of this new vaccine. And we ask how funding cuts for vaccine research could impact health outcomes not just for Americans, but for the world.
0:00 How does the new mRNA skin cancer vaccine work?
2:56 How effective is the new cancer vaccine?
5:06 How do mRNA vaccines work?
6:51 How was mRNA technology developed?
10:26 How did Covid change mRNA vaccines?
12:01 Why is RFK Jr cutting mRNA funding?
15:19 Are mRNA vaccines safe?
18:48 Why is the FDA approving an mRNA flu vaccine?
21:00 What does the future of mRNA research look like?
Subscribe to our channel here: https://bbc.in/bbcnews
For the latest news download the BBC News app or visit BBC.com/news
#BBCNews
source
Tech UK
Historic first as Chinese robot beats Usain Bolt’s 100m world record at Beijing games | BBC News
A Chinese humanoid robot has run 100 metres in 9.39 seconds in a preliminary heat at the World Humanoid Robot Games in Beijing, surpassing the men’s world record time held by Jamaican sprinting great Usain Bolt.
Tiangong Ultra, developed by the Beijing Humanoid Robot Innovation Center, won its heat at the opening of the games’ second edition. The robot overtook smartphone maker Honor’s Lightning near the finish after falling behind early in the race. Lightning finished in 9.47 seconds, also faster than the 9.58-second record Bolt set at the 2009 World Athletics Championships in Berlin.
The results marked a remarkable improvement from last year’s inaugural games, when Tiangong Ultra won the 100 metres in 21.50 seconds. Tiangong also won the world’s first humanoid robot half-marathon, held in Beijing last year.
The 100 metres is among 51 events at the games, which include football, dancing and contests to complete industrial tasks.
China is promoting humanoid robots as a strategic emerging industry, with policymakers and companies betting that advances in AI and hardware will accelerate their use in manufacturing, logistics and consumer applications.
Investor enthusiasm for the sector was underscored recently when shares in Unitree, China’s best-known humanoid robot maker, jumped more than five fold in its Shanghai trading debut, giving the company a market value of about $50 billion.
This year’s games have drawn 2,056 robots from 666 teams across 16 countries and six continents, up from 280 teams at the inaugural event.
Clive Myrie presents BBC News at Ten reporting by Laura Bicker in Beijing.
Subscribe to our channel here: https://bbc.in/bbcnews
For the latest news download the BBC News app or visit BBC.com/news
#BBCNews
source
Every year, new reports warn that our roads are getting worse and potholes are becoming more common. Experts say the cost of …
source
Artificial intelligence was the technology lots of people wanted to talk about at the Dentistry Show in Birmingham, UK.
From 3D printing to digital scanners and AI receptionists, there are many ways in which technology is helping dentists’ workflow.
We tried some of the tech on display.
Subscribe to our channel here: https://bbc.in/bbcnews
For the latest news download the BBC News app or visit BBC.com/news
#AI #Dentistry #BBCNews
source
There was a time when sleeping was simple – but now, it’s a bit more complicated.
Sleep has rules – there’s the right bedtime, the right temperature, and the right amount of deep sleep.
It’s not just something we do, it’s something we measure.
But is all this number punching actually helping us rest?
Subscribe to our channel here: https://bbc.in/bbcnews
For the latest news download the BBC News app or visit BBC.com/news
#Sleep #Technology #BBCNews
source
-
Food UK3 years agoPANCAKES EXPERIMENT: SAME Ingredients DIFFERENT Techniques
-
Other UK3 years ago
The BBC is on obtained time and is quick ending up being Bri…
-
Fashion UK2 years ago
TDX x TB Rock Band EDJ (“All For You”) Full Song + Lyrics – Tower Defense X Roblox
-
Other UK3 years ago
Making it through an honour killing – BBC News
-
Other UK3 years ago
Could Reform Cost the Tories the Next Election?
-
Fashion UK1 year ago
HIGH ON YOU – Jind Universe | Latest Punjabi Love Song 2024
-
Other UK3 years ago
Prince Harry was victim of phone hacking by Mirror Group New…
-
Business UK2 years ago
Martin Daubney | Wednesday 27th November
-
Business UK3 years ago‘This is his top priority’ | Jake Berry on Tom Tugendhat’s economy plans
-
Politics UK3 years agoEnding Anonymity Online: Britain’s Plans to Change the Internet – TLDR News
@innerc8951
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
If they argue that AI learn like a human does, that means they create like human does, therefore prompters could not really say that they are the artist at all, rather they are at most the commissioner or Art director for the AI “art”, which means they can not have the copyright over the artwork, if they argue that AI doesn’t learn like human does, then the AI companies are just stealing from artist, which is violating copyright, either way AI “art” violates copyright law. People who defend AI art theft wants to also be called “AI Artist” and own the copyright of those “art”, they want to have their cake and eat it to.
@AllTimeNoobie
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
So why is art work considered copyright material but lines and shapes aren't? If AI cannot use public information to train its model, then why can human use public information to train their brains to draw or why can camera/software engineers use public information to train/program their tools to perform functions of drawing (for example photography captures light using basic apeture/shutter knowledge public to all)
@lewisnicolls7933
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Art has inspired art since man painted on cave walls. This no different. AI art is here and our society is better for it.
@lovelight1
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Theft has already been committed by using art from humans to produce this bogus so called art. Its a joke, ie Bullshit. COPYRIGHT LAWS TO PROTECT US ALL.
@jennylee8725
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Viva la vera arte❤
@paxamericanafilms
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Hair by AI
@P13r6
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
What If you train a dataset based on your own artwork instead? I know some artists did
@DrownedInBile666
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
You mean can artists protect their art from selfish tech companies who don't give a fuck if people want their stuff used or not?
@iamwifstupid
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
One day.
The society will be like~i put a input my A.I to shoot someone on the street, so when Police came~i will let them take the A.I to the court instead because i am not the one pulling trigger.
I might be the one to put those commands on the A.I so~Hey, the A.I can choose not to follow my order though, because i am not pointing a gun at it.
U.S have to put a stop to all these cultures …The cultures of the people with whatever reasons that could still get away by being just simply being stubborn about whatever they're doing is not committed crime .
@Anonymouthful
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
AI "artist" are scum, they openly admit to stealing while making excuse after excuse about how its not theft while scurrying off to make money from your work.
@KatsudonArt
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
If there's one thing for sure is that these ai machines should be destroyed. It shouldn't be here in the first place.
Art is a human activity. We can't lose that to a machine who's only job is to make soulless art for human consumption while we, the HUMAN BEINGS waste away on menial jobs.
@jonmichaelgalindo
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
SDXL is trained on 100% public domain and/or licensed datasets with opt-in for artists. SDXL is comparable to Midjourney, and vastly superior to Adobe's Firefly. But this "art theft" argument is from a month ago, after all. That's like 100 years in AI progress time.
@romepaysoff
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
With almost any creative prospect to do with the internet these days, the issue is curatorship, If everyone can make it, then we'll all be making and nobody will be looking, much less trying to sell it. We'll all be creators and we'll care as much about AI 'art' as we would about your mate's kid's fridge drawings.
@johnyandreas6559
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Should I say goos bye work and there will be a lot of people who don't have a job? Will we be like the Chinese Republic youngsters "better stay in the bedroom, even if I struggle, it will not take me everywhere, abd why should I live?"
Interesting topic thank you to BBC. I worked for outsourcing company and yes I am afraid of the wild development of AI.
Good day
@salim.ch818
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Eglie's normal 🌱👱♀️⛪🧚♀️🌹✅?🔬🤔💭🏳️🌈Eglie's 🧬💩🏳️🌈🚾💒💞0+0👬💩🎓🤝⚖🤝🎨🏳️🌈Eglie's zombie 🚾💒💞👬💩?🛐⁉️
@itzdcx7991
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
pandering nerd
@itzdcx7991
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
OH WELL DON'T COMPLAIN ADAPT
@retroartist9186
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Great Video!!
@WarrenRehman
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
How do human artists learn? These humans learn through a process called learning by observing the art and techniques used by other humans… and they don't get permission from the artists they try to learn from.
@kellyro77
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
What's infuriating is that artists are having to potentially pay extra for protection instead of the other way around where these businesses that already make billions of dollars aren't required to pay people to use their images to add to their AI learning databases. And of course this extends to written language, too. I'm curious how Disney is watching this. They're notoriously litigious and you'd think they'd be all over AI companies for scraping their intellectual property. Or, maybe AI companies KNEW they'd be in trouble so excluded Disney from their data scraping? Anyone know?
@nyxetera
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
We’re losing the meaning of a singular perspective. Like- I look at art to see someone’s point of view, or to hear their story. Blending everyone’s work into a meaningless slurry, into just empty style and aesthetic. Like – it’s the human-to-human interaction that makes art fun and meaningful. It’s horrifying to lose that.
@josemanuel947
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
and i ask: can an AI protect his work from an "artist" ?
@Wallyisking
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
The ship has sailed, hasn't it? Kind of like entering an event horizon? I really like Michio Kaku's perspective on this. When the processing speed of our working computers begins to transcend orders of magnitude, and the work that may have taken us years to do just days before may take us minutes and seconds instead, where do we go as a society? It seems silly to me that currency in any form would eventually matter, because if all the jobs are run for us, and all our needs are met, what is left of us but to dance as players on a stage of dreams? Hopefully we can all get along and embrace each other.
@jamescarroll8917
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
If you put your art online, you are letting humans see it, and you understand that humans might be inspired by your images to make similar art. If a human can do this, then so can an AI. And if you are saying that an AI can't do this, you are claiming that a human can't. The claim that it's not the same because a AI is "better" at it, is akin to saying that AI is just more talented than you, so we need to stop it.
@markcooperartcom
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Glaze doesn't work. It makes your art look like crap and noone will buy it.
@graphosxp
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Did Ms. Ortega ask Steve Ditko for his consent when drawing Dr. Strange? Come on folks, let's admit this was a very "crooked house" long before AI Art came along!
@LeornianCyng
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
AI is getting out of control. I remember studying the potential effects of AI years ago at University, was terrified then and terrified now. Yes if used properly then it can have significant benefits. However, it’s being misused in the most disruptive way possible. Especially when it comes to art, literature, music etc….
@raylopez99
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
B.S. cry me a river. The works done are not similar but often radically different. Same thing happens in computer science with 'borrowed code'.
@email7919
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
You explained how it works very poorly
@CapAnson12345
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
I just think it's funny how nobody had a problem with AI when they thought it would only replace the jobs of mathematicians, engineers and maybe coders etc… but the moment it's artists, musicians, designers, writers, and teachers.. everyone loses their minds. It's just a tool. Same as it always has been. If the tool makes your job obsolete.. time to well.. I guess learning to code is out now.
@Chromastellia
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
ai art is like saying "i wanna cook some food at home" but you order mcdonalds claiming its yours.
@Dogtroll
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
The companies that are running these A.I.s claim that they are not producing copies of art works. If that is true then don't they have to provide evidence of atleast one really truly original work of art done by an A.I. to prove it? I mean think about it, although it may be true that humans learn how to create art by studying other people's work irregardless there are humans who produce genuinely original work.
@gopalkumarsharma3940
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Fir❤hom
@gopalkumarsharma3940
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
🎉nokol"
@gopalkumarsharma3940
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
M. Card
@gopalkumarsharma3940
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Mi❤
@gopalkumarsharma3940
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
But. Never. School
@gopalkumarsharma3940
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
❤❤❤😢😅
@speedy6997
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
They (BBC) switch off the comment section for Andrew Tate charge video but keep comments on for other videos. See how corrupt the media is in pushing for an agenda they want. They don't report the news. No one does these days. It's all an opinion to push forth their agenda. Again these charges against Andrew Tate, there is no evidence; they can't put forth anything as they don't have anything. I don't even watch Tate videos, but plainly looking at this using common sense, and oh boy, do I see lies and hypocrisy everywhere from the media side. And if you can't see that, then God help you.
@Xman72498X
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Carla is lying. Saying the AI somehow magically "archive and store" every image and produce "exact copies" is but a big lie.
@Xman72498X
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Sadly Glaze can literally be removed by 16 lines of code.
@bassekaman8315
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Donny i will be using Ai instead of overpriced artists for the rest of my life thank god
@xanthopurpurin
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Brilliant, shoot yourself in the foot by destroying the quality of your artwork, making it look like a heavily compressed JPEG full of artifacts just to avoid people reproducing your artistic style. Generative AI is transformative by definition. It is not stealing or copying as there's always a bit of randomness involved. Instead of being happy for their contribution to common good and unlocking new creative possibilities of humanity the greedy artists act incredibly selfish by seeking to extract royalties out of every generated image out there. Why bother creating anything if you do not wish people to alter, customize or build upon your work? This tech is here to stay. Get over it.
@jalvincascanteii8100
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
BBC is garbage! u clowns, leave tate alone.
@HotdogFiend69
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Carla is either lying or misinformed. These image generators do not archive billions of images and make exact copies. Stable diffusion is only like 3 gigabytes. It hasn't stored copies of any image and the gaussian noise seed ensures every image is unique.
@michwashington
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
4:22 It’s the same as saying a human copied me🤔 you can’t copyright ©️ a color.
@michwashington
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
1:48 she needs to adapt !
@1Kind1
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Art is born out of the heart and soul of mankind… Currently A.I. is just regurgitating analytics and producing new data. The world is on a whole frontier…where pure originality is the rarest thing on this planet and it's Priceless ❤
@calvintang398
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
Now you know why Japan use DVD/CD for distribution of artists products? And do you know why Japan set the law banning filming other's face online(unless get permission)?
Answer: AI/internet is stealing field for real
@Emkei2010
December 29, 2023 at 6:46 pm
The competition have levelled up.👍